<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 15 minute SEO &#8211; Covering the basics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dinkuminteractive.com/15-minute-seo-covering-the-basics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dinkuminteractive.com/15-minute-seo-covering-the-basics/</link>
	<description>Fully Integrated Internet Marketing Company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:27:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Seo</title>
		<link>http://www.dinkuminteractive.com/15-minute-seo-covering-the-basics/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator>Seo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dinkuminteractive.com/?p=133#comment-164</guid>
		<description>I think your right, flash can be seo friendly, i have seen one of my flash site&#039;s get a page rank of 3 in just three months. It was quite simple really i just added links from two page rank 4 sites to my site, also the sites are relevant to my sector.

I think seo is very time consuming but if you know which tools to use it helps to get higher ranking much quicker. But i think people really need to be realistic as what can be achieved with a new website.

Google&#039;s trust rank means more than page rank and this requires your site to be quite old, so if you could prove me wrong on this matter with examples to new sites ranking high then please do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your right, flash can be seo friendly, i have seen one of my flash site&#8217;s get a page rank of 3 in just three months. It was quite simple really i just added links from two page rank 4 sites to my site, also the sites are relevant to my sector.</p>
<p>I think seo is very time consuming but if you know which tools to use it helps to get higher ranking much quicker. But i think people really need to be realistic as what can be achieved with a new website.</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s trust rank means more than page rank and this requires your site to be quite old, so if you could prove me wrong on this matter with examples to new sites ranking high then please do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WebComp Analyst</title>
		<link>http://www.dinkuminteractive.com/15-minute-seo-covering-the-basics/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>WebComp Analyst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 23:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dinkuminteractive.com/?p=133#comment-163</guid>
		<description>You are correct ... this article doesn&#039;t make a big dent, but it scratches at most things and gives the right pointers.

One thing that I would add though ... try and get a keyword embedded domain. From what I see, you get an automatic boost through the SERPS if your domain has the searched for keywords.

If you spot a new niche ... grab the right domain name fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are correct &#8230; this article doesn&#8217;t make a big dent, but it scratches at most things and gives the right pointers.</p>
<p>One thing that I would add though &#8230; try and get a keyword embedded domain. From what I see, you get an automatic boost through the SERPS if your domain has the searched for keywords.</p>
<p>If you spot a new niche &#8230; grab the right domain name fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.dinkuminteractive.com/15-minute-seo-covering-the-basics/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 05:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dinkuminteractive.com/?p=133#comment-162</guid>
		<description>1. code

2. Content

3. Traffic

4. links

All have to be related to your site, should be quality, natural and placed through organic means.

Don&#039;t over think it, SEO is not rocket science.... Just  hard honest work.

Thanks,

Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. code</p>
<p>2. Content</p>
<p>3. Traffic</p>
<p>4. links</p>
<p>All have to be related to your site, should be quality, natural and placed through organic means.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t over think it, SEO is not rocket science&#8230;. Just  hard honest work.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO optimization</title>
		<link>http://www.dinkuminteractive.com/15-minute-seo-covering-the-basics/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO optimization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dinkuminteractive.com/?p=133#comment-161</guid>
		<description>I disagree with SEO Guy&#039;s comments regarding Meta Data.

Please Google &quot;Page Rank Secrets for Flash Sites&quot; to read my article about how to optimize a Flash website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree with SEO Guy&#8217;s comments regarding Meta Data.</p>
<p>Please Google &#8220;Page Rank Secrets for Flash Sites&#8221; to read my article about how to optimize a Flash website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.dinkuminteractive.com/15-minute-seo-covering-the-basics/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dinkuminteractive.com/?p=133#comment-160</guid>
		<description>I have read many places that Meta Data is no longer important. I do not agree.  A good title and description can do wonders for your se work.  For a flash site, that is all that you have to work with.

I do not know much about the off page stuff, but for on page, obviously, content is king.  However, meta data is the queen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read many places that Meta Data is no longer important. I do not agree.  A good title and description can do wonders for your se work.  For a flash site, that is all that you have to work with.</p>
<p>I do not know much about the off page stuff, but for on page, obviously, content is king.  However, meta data is the queen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gewdton</title>
		<link>http://www.dinkuminteractive.com/15-minute-seo-covering-the-basics/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Gewdton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 02:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dinkuminteractive.com/?p=133#comment-159</guid>
		<description>Forum/Blogging participation is something that not a lot of people do, it&#039;s not really that hard, it&#039;s great to get links back to your site.

Just make sure that the comments you post are relevance and have some value added to the topic!

Like what I&#039;m doing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forum/Blogging participation is something that not a lot of people do, it&#8217;s not really that hard, it&#8217;s great to get links back to your site.</p>
<p>Just make sure that the comments you post are relevance and have some value added to the topic!</p>
<p>Like what I&#8217;m doing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO optimization</title>
		<link>http://www.dinkuminteractive.com/15-minute-seo-covering-the-basics/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO optimization</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 00:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dinkuminteractive.com/?p=133#comment-158</guid>
		<description>I liked your comments about meta tags.  So many writers nowadays try to downplay the value of meta tags.

But, meta tags are invaluable - just go look at the Google responses for some of them who ignore meta tags and you&#039;ll find that Google takes a snippet of meaningless jargon from the middle of the page.

If the description tag had been used, Google would have indexed what the site owner wanted, instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked your comments about meta tags.  So many writers nowadays try to downplay the value of meta tags.</p>
<p>But, meta tags are invaluable &#8211; just go look at the Google responses for some of them who ignore meta tags and you&#8217;ll find that Google takes a snippet of meaningless jargon from the middle of the page.</p>
<p>If the description tag had been used, Google would have indexed what the site owner wanted, instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

