Interested in what Google actually looks at when evaluating a website? The recent SEO report card (PDF) that it issued on itself may offer businesses some insight into what the “Big G” really considers important. Focused on all of the Google properties (i.e. YouTube, GoogleMaps, Adwords, Google Reader, Blogger etc…), the report is broken down into three sections: Search Result Presentation, URLs and Redirects and On-page Optimizations. While each section discusses its performance in several areas, I’d like to focus on the areas in which Google admits poor performance to use as an example of how businesses can improve their websites.
Google feels that it has quite a few areas that need improvement within its presentation of search results; I’m sure that this may be the case for many businesses too. Interestingly the first two focus on basic Search Engine Optimization practices, while the last focuses on something that may not necessarily warrant undue attention:
The humble Title tag is among the most powerful SEO tool around and apparently Google doesn’t use the as effectively as it could. Descriptive, keyword-rich Title Tags are important. Only 10% of Google’s pages have adequate Title Tags.
67% of Google’s pages do not have an adequate Meta Description – that’s pretty sucky. While Meta Descriptions Tags reportedly don’t count in Google’s ranking, an informative description means a lot to users and have a dramatic impact.
While Webmaster’s cannot control when site links are displayed, those that receive them don’t make them appealing. This may not apply to most sites, but Google suggests blocking unwanted or unappealing sitelinks using Google Webmaster Tools.
Google’s products have a variety of URL structures that use both subdomain and directory forms (i.e. http://maps.google.com/ vs http://www.google.com/latitude/) that may or may not include a trailing slash. Most of the metrics in this section were determined not to be gradable, so rather than geek out highly technical stuff specific to Google, I’ll offer some of their advice that may be more useful:
For example www.google.com/products and www.google.com/products/ are considered two separate pages resulting in diluted reputation.
Create a 301 Redirect for searches that users commonly employ that result in a Page Not Found error. Businesses can do this by regularly reviewing their analytics information.
Ok. We’re not going to get into a discussion of Canonicalization here, but when it’s necessary to redirect a user’s request, send that request to the canonical URL. This will allow that URL to accumulate reputation rather than spread it out over several (and effectively getting no benefit).
Use 301 Redirects whenever possible. Also, remember that http://mysite.com is different than http://www.mysite.com so make sure you’ve picked your preferred URL and redirect the other accordingly.
Google had a bunch more, but these pretty much cover it. Sorry if I went off on a tangent, but this is important stuff.
On page optimization can encompass a wide range of areas for most websites, but Google focused on just 5 in its report card.
22% of Google’s pages fail to use Heading Tags; most businesses fail to use them at all. Heading tags provide structure to content for both users and search engines. Unfortunately, most businesses simply style copy on the webpage, rather than use Heading Tags which will help search performance.
Using text that is brief, descriptive and keyword rich is important for any image, not just a logo. By Google’s own admission, it makes it easier for their search engine to understand what the page is about.
Using descriptive (& ideally keyword-rich) is a good way to give the search engines a clue as to what exists on the destination page. By the way, Google ranked itself as “Satisfactory” but I thought that this was important enough to throw in.
Overall, I enjoyed reviewing Google’s own SEO Report Card, but I’m more interested in yours. How would your site perform? Please share you thoughts in our comments section. If you don’t know how well your site would perform, we’d welcome the opportunity to crack the hood and take a look for you; contact us today.
Bill Rowland
How are you using Social Media Today?
Copyright Dinkum Interactive 2009-2012. All Rights Reserved.
February 8, 2012. Posted under: Blog.
In the past two weeks, I attended two conferences that were world’s apart but linked. One was focused on large, profitable companies. The other involved nonprofits. They both discussed social media. The first conference featured CEOs, many of whom are grappling with the use of social media within their organizations. Each CEO had a bit of a different take on
