<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dinkum Interactive &#187; Pro Blogger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dinkuminteractive.com/tag/pro-blogger/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dinkuminteractive.com</link>
	<description>Fully Integrated Internet Marketing Company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 11:00:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Blog Comments Policy: First Crack</title>
		<link>http://www.dinkuminteractive.com/blog-comments-policy-first-crack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.dinkuminteractive.com/blog-comments-policy-first-crack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 11:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog comments policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darren Rowse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro Blogger]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dinkuminteractive.com/?p=830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After some thoughtful consideration following my last post Blog Comments Policy: We All Need One, I decided to take a crack at formulating Dinkum Interactive’s Blog Comments Policy. As previously mentioned the purpose of such a policy is to ensure that the blog is relevant and useful; since this could cover a broad range of topics, I’d like to keep]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After some thoughtful consideration following my last post <a title="Blog Comments Policy: We All Need One" href="http://blog.dinkuminteractive.com/blog-comments-policy-we-all-need-one/" target="_blank"><strong>Blog Comments Policy: We All Need One</strong></a>, I decided to take a crack at formulating Dinkum Interactive’s Blog Comments Policy. As previously mentioned the purpose of such a policy is to ensure that the blog is relevant and useful; since this could cover a broad range of topics, I’d like to keep the policy focused, flexible and easy to understand.</p>
<p>Researching what others have done, I looked at a number of blog comments policies and I found one that I really like: the <a title="Blog Comments Policy of Pro Blogger" href="http://www.problogger.net/archives/2005/11/03/problogger-comments-policy/" target="_blank">Blog Comments Policy of Pro Blogger</a> Darren Rowse. Granted, it was written in 2005 but the basics still apply and it’s a good place to start.</p>
<p>Armed with Darren’s thoughts and Dinkum’s experiences, here are the basics or our Blog Comments Policy:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>We Love Comments</strong> – Our goal is to provide valuable content to our readers and a large part of that includes the discussion generated by our posts. We encourage everyone, beginners and experts alike, to offer their perspective on the topics being discussed.</li>
<li><strong>We Moderate Comments</strong> – Unfortunately the concepts of common courtesy and taste vary. In an effort to maintain a welcoming, respectful environment every comment is moderated before publication.</li>
<li><strong>We Delete Spam</strong> – Unnecessary, irrelevant and off-topic comments decrease the value of our blog to readers and will be deleted.</li>
<li><strong>Relevant Links Are Encouraged</strong> – As with any good discussion, citing sources to information or resources relevant to the topic increases value to participants and is encouraged. Conversely, links that are off-topic and inappropriate will be deleted.</li>
<li> <strong>Comment Signatures Require a Name</strong> – In order to foster conversation and strengthen community, we require those commenting to leave a name. After all, when was the last time you had a conversation with “Chicago Realtor” or “Lakeland Internet Marketing”?</li>
<li><strong>All Rights Reserved </strong>– We reserve the right to edit, delete, move, or mark as spam any and all comments.</li>
</ol>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Note:</strong> #5 may change; we haven’t decided. The name requirement stems from our position as a DoFollow Blog. Briefly, a DoFollow Blog rewards comments by providing the commenter a link that passes value to the site specified by the commenter using the given name. Unfortunately, this is the reason for a great deal of comment spam which cheapens the value of any blog.</p>
<p>So, what do you think? Am I off-base? Is it too broad or too restrictive? Please offer your opinion.</p>
<p>Bill Rowland</p>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_32x32_style" addthis:url='http://www.dinkuminteractive.com/blog-comments-policy-first-crack/' addthis:title='Blog Comments Policy: First Crack' ><a class="addthis_button_twitter"></a><a class="addthis_button_facebook"></a><a class="addthis_button_linkedin"></a><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.dinkuminteractive.com/blog-comments-policy-first-crack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

